Create an Account
Forgot your Password?
World of Warcraft
WowRiot
Starcraft 2
Starfeeder
Hellforge
Hellforge
 
Machinima
Myndflame
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead
RazeTheWorld
RazeTheWorld
 
Quake Live
Quake Life
1337pwn
1337pwn
Limit Break
Limit Break
 
Resident Evil
Resident Evil
Gameriot Store
Buy Games!
Be a part of our community!
 
 
 
POST STUFF
close
New Blog Post
Add a Video
Host an Image
Upload a File
by Idoliside, Level 22
Last updated at September 28, 2009, 9:27 am


It's that time again when the genius’s over at DirectX come out with their latest version and the graphics card manufacturers go mental with advertising slogans mentioning the need for the latest version. This time being DirectX 11.

 

The problem with this kind of upgrade and promoting it is that trying to sell it through screenshots doesn’t really work. It previously happened over DX10 with comparison shots showing how amazing DX10 was over DX9, but unless you had extra sharp vision it was hard to tell the difference. The same is happening now with DX11, recently the latest Stalker developers unleashed some screenshots of Call Of Pripyat calling to people’s attentions how amazing it looked in the new format. And yet again I can barely tell the difference.

 

I’m not saying that DX11 isn’t a worthy upgrade or doesn’t make any significant improvements. It probably will be a vast improvement over DX10 in terms of dynamic power, rendering and programming. It will probably allow developers to do optimise their graphics code a bit better so it runs without too much processing power.


But that’s what the DX upgrades are for. It’s streamlining the code, not impressive effects. The pretty effects are all done by the developer, even a low cost game can have really impressive visuals because of styling. We are now exiting the age when graphical ability sells the game (Crysis still being the universal benchmark for new systems) and entering a time when game developers are making their games stylised as apposed to “oh wow, look at the realism”.

 

So game developers trying to show the impressiveness of a DX upgrade through screenshots is ultimately pointless. You see a few extra shadows, maybe a bit where your bump-mapping rendering is a little better. And of course ATI and nVidia are pulling out their new state-of-the-art cards and trying to push DX11 in the eternal race for graphical dominance. If you want to sell me DX11, show me that it will reduce my CPU load, that older systems will be able to run state of the art games. Show me the real improvement not some minor graphical tweaks which could easily be done in DX9.

     
4 comments
thePinkBurns
thePinkBurns Sep 28, 2009 at 3:40 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
NoYou
NoYou Sep 28, 2009 at 4:25 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Same here, still using dx9.
dx10 was made to promote vista.
It had some nice features, but mostly cosmetic, nothing groundbreaking.
Most developers didnt utilize them anyway, exceptions are the games with the gfw logo on the box... just to show off and get a better deal with microsoft.
CloudFire
CloudFire Oct 2, 2009 at 6:04 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
First off, every new Windows comes with a new API. XP had DX9 and Vista had DX10. One of the reasons why DX10 wasn't pushed was b/c Nvidia wasn't ready to go on board with DX10 at the time and since they were a big influence, it slowed progress and DX9 stuck on for much longer. And now Nv isn't even on DX11 either, ATI has the jump with their Cypress (58xx) series of cards. 

So now, DX11 has better hopes b/c it is a superset of DX10/10.1 meaning that its main codes are from the structure of DX10. It is not an entirely new API like DX9 ->DX10, so adoption will be much easier.

Another thing about DX11 is tessellation and better multi-core support. I don't really want to type up an essay so i'll just link if you want to know more.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3643&p=6

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-5870,2422-6.html

If you are still running windows XP and your hardware is a few years old, it wouldn't really make much sense to jump onto W7 for the new API b/c your gfx card won't do a thing differently. However, if you are getting a new computer or gfx card, then the choices you have to make for which OS might be different especially if you're comp is multi-core.
Blackhand
Blackhand Oct 2, 2009 at 6:48 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Its about time, no DirectX version has stuck around as long as DirectX 9. With the decent uptake of Windows 7 and DX 11 cards right around the corner, we may finally see hardware driving innovation again.
blog vitals
Just your regular blog with someone who generally talks out of their behind alot. But sometimes out of all the rubbish comes some insightful comments about the gaming industry and random humor.
4 Subscribers
comments10    Likes: 6    November 10, 2009, 6:38 am
comments1    Likes: 4    October 6, 2009, 4:40 am
comments1    Likes: 2    October 2, 2009, 2:00 pm
comments4    Likes: 4    September 28, 2009, 9:27 am
comments1    Likes: 6    September 26, 2009, 10:21 am
comments0    Likes: 3    September 23, 2009, 6:22 am
comments3    Likes: 5    September 21, 2009, 4:09 pm
comments5    Likes: 5    September 16, 2009, 3:54 pm
Started February 12, 2009
34 Total Entries
THE SPOTLIGHT
Aion: The First 10 Levels
1 of 11
THE IMAGE FEED
13 images uploaded in the last 30 days. Got an image you need hosted?
Copyright ©2007-2010 GameRiot All Rights Reserved.